Players
Extremely users was in fact elite group psychologists recruited on the internet using membership in almost any top-notch teams, the latest American Psychological Organization (APA)-Behavior Providers on the web practitioner list (apapractice.org of about fifteen,057 players).
Along with https://datingranking.net/de/fitness-dating-de/ enough APA-acknowledged counseling stores, fellow member solicitation age-emails was in fact including delivered to APA Section 17 (Counseling Psychology, 355 participants); APA Section 30 (Therapy, around 224 players); APA Section thirty two (Humanistic Therapy, approximately 130 users); The new United states Individual Construct Community (NAPCN) number serve (everything 95 members); the fresh new Albert Ellis Institute elizabeth-mail number (as much as 57 users). The solicitation elizabeth-send and additionally recommended players so you’re able to submit the fresh new e-send survey to almost every other qualified practitioners; additionally the reaction rate of approximately 13.5% should be considered having reservations (just as much as 15,918 studies was basically solicited and dos,149 came back).
Counselor participation is actually volunteer, it took therapists everything 30 minutes to complete the instruments, and the data was conducted in line with APA moral assistance.
Class
The sample consisted of 1151 therapists (733 women, 418 men) with a Mage of (SD = ). The sample was prierican, 88.8% (N =1030), followed by Multiracial, 2.9% (N = 34), Hispanic, 2.7% (N = 31), African American, 2.4% (N = 28), Asian American, 2.1% (N = 24), and Other, 1.1% (N = 13).
Users was questioned to suggest the level of the highest knowledge held, and therefore contains Ph.D., sixty.1% (N = 700); followed closely by Meters.Good./M.S., 18.6% (Letter = 216); Psy.D., 11.0% (Letter = 128); B.Good./B.S., 4.3% (N = 50); Ed.D., step one.7% (Letter = 20); Yards.S.W., 1.4% (N = 16); or any other, 2.9% (Letter = 34). Concurrently, the average year professionals gotten their highest education is (SD =eleven.1), in addition to the mediocre total number regarding ages spent within the systematic behavior getting (SD = ). Most participants was in fact no more at school, 93.5% (Letter = 1105); 6.5% (Letter = 77) have been scholar youngsters.
At exactly the same time, people had been asked their dominating theoretic positioning and more than participants conveyed one to their principal theoretic direction are cognitive behavioral, thirty-five.9% (Letter = 414); followed by integrative, 18.1% (Letter = 209); psychodynamic, 15.2% (Letter = 175); interpersonal, eight.6% (N = 88); humanistic, 7.2% (N = 83); constructivist, step 3.2% (Letter = 37); existential, dos.2% (N = 25); rational-emotive, 1.7% (N = 20); gestalt, 0.7% (Letter = 8); or other, 8.2% (N = 95).
Tips
Members on the the latter teams had been sent an online questionnaire who has the best agree mode, a brief demographics recommendations piece, therefore the four measures: Specialist perceptions questionnaire-small setting (TAQ-SF); Constructivist assumptions scale (CAS); Private form of this new therapist questionnaire (PST-Q); Working alliance list-brief form (WAI-S); and also the Processes record (TL). Participants had been debriefed after the analysis and you can was indeed provided by the fresh email address for further inquiries.
Specialist Perceptions Questionnaire-Brief Setting (TAQ-SF)
The new TAQ-SF, developed by Neimeyer and you can Morton (1997), try a revise of Specialist Attitudes Survey (TAQ) created by DisGiuseppe and you will Linscott (1993). The brand new TAQ-SF measures philosophical, theoretic, and you may technical size of rationalist and constructivist therapies. The appliance consists of 16 circumstances ranked toward a beneficial 5-point Likert measure anywhere between 1 (strongly differ) in order to 5 (strongly agree), and requirements around 5 minutes doing. This new TAQ-SF replicates the basic basis design of your own brand spanking new TAQ and you will indicates their predictive authenticity of the forecasting the new healing identifications and you may meanings out of several doing positives (Neimeyer Morton, 1997). TAQ-SF scores in the present data produced an excellent Chronbach’s alpha away from .72 for rationalist measure and you will good Chronbach’s alpha away from .63 into the constructivist scale (see Desk step one).
Constructivist Assumptions Scale (CAS)
The fresh Constructivist Assumptions Measure (CAS) is made because of the Berzonsky (1994), and you can was created to evaluate constructivist epistemological assumptions. This might be a great twelve-goods worry about-declaration scale with every item becoming ranked to your a great 5-section Likert scale between step one (strongly differ) so you can 5 (strongly concur). The fresh new Cas possess internal reliability projected to-be .61, and you will a 2-week decide to try-retest accuracy (Letter = 78) out of .68. Cas results in the present data yielded an effective Chronbach’s alpha from .72 (pick Dining table step 1).
